SAP C_S4TM Exam Overview:
| Certification Vendor: | SAP |
| Exam Name: | SAP Certified Associate - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Transportation Management |
| Exam Number: | C_S4TM_2601 |
| Real Exam Qty: | 80 |
| Passing Score: | 65% |
| Exam Duration: | 180 minutes |
| Certificate Validity Period: | Stay Certified (validity depends on SAP certification maintenance policy and release updates) |
| Available Languages: | English, German |
| Related Certifications: | SAP Certified Associate - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition SAP Certified Application Associate - Transportation Management |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Choice, Multiple Response |
| Exam Price: | USD 500 (varies by country/region) |
| Recommended Training: | SAP Help Portal - Transportation Management Documentation SAP Learning - Transportation Management Learning Journeys |
| Exam Registration: | SAP Certification Portal SAP Training and Certification Shop |
| Sample Questions: | SAP C_S4TM Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or test center (depending on SAP certification provider availability in region) |
| Pre Condition: | Basic knowledge of SAP S/4HANA logistics processes and transportation management concepts is recommended. Prior SAP logistics certification is beneficial but not mandatory. |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://learning.sap.com/certifications |
SAP C_S4TM Exam Syllabus Topics:
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Execution and Tracking | - Transportation execution processes
|
| Charge Management and Settlement | - Freight costing and charge calculation
|
| Master Data and Organizational Structure | - Organizational units in TM
|
| Planning and Optimization | - Freight unit building and planning
|
| Transportation Management Overview | - Core concepts of SAP TM in S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition
|
| Integration and Fiori Applications | - SAP Fiori apps for TM
|
| Freight Order Management | - Freight order creation and lifecycle
|
SAP Certified - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Transportation Management (C_S4TM_2601) Sample Questions:
1. CHALLENGE 2 - Depot Consolidation Timing for Freight Order Execution
A planner manually creates a freight order for a consolidation-depot pickup so the carrier can be confirmed quickly. The freight order is executable, but the planned arrival timing does not match the depot receiving sequence.
What is the best recommendation?
Response:
A) Move all consolidation-depot pickups to direct supplier pickup processing for the remainder of hypercare.
B) Delay all freight order execution until finance completes charge allocation for the related purchasing documents.
C) Validate that freight order grouping and release timing preserve the intended depot consolidation sequence.
D) Accept the freight order because fast carrier confirmation is the main hypercare success measure.
2. CHALLENGE 3 - Event Visibility for Controlled-Temperature Dispatch Readiness Warehouse teams begin staging controlled-temperature parcels based on preliminary planner expectations. Subcontracting confirmation and event updates arrive later, causing dispatch teams to move parcels between staging areas before carrier pickup.
What should the consultant recommend?
Response:
A) Base controlled-temperature staging on confirmed subcontracting status and usable event visibility rather than preliminary planning expectations.
B) Require finance to approve carrier charges before the warehouse begins dispatch staging.
C) Continue early staging because dispatch speed is more important than transport visibility during remediation.
D) Disable event tracking for clinic deliveries until freight settlement is completed.
3. CHALLENGE 3 - Carrier Output Timing for Loading Cutoff Readiness
A carrier receives output for a bonded warehouse pickup and accepts the shipment. Later, the warehouse loading cutoff changes because the freight order was adjusted after communication was sent.
What is the best second-order diagnosis?
Response:
A) Delivery relevance is unnecessary once carrier output has been accepted by the carrier.
B) Carrier communication is consuming freight order information before the pickup window is stable enough for loading readiness.
C) Charge calculation is incomplete, so carrier output cannot reflect the warehouse loading cutoff.
D) Settlement should be posted before warehouse teams prepare loading slots.
4. CHALLENGE 4 - Charge Calculation and Settlement Grouping Alignment
Finance reports that freight settlement documents are created, but the cost distribution does not consistently match the delivery-item grouping used by planners when freight orders were executed. Dispatchers suggest fixing the invoices manually after go-live.
Which response best supports rollout readiness?
Response:
A) Stop freight order execution testing and focus only on carrier agreement rate maintenance until all charges calculate.
B) Accept manual invoice correction for the first close because transportation execution is already working.
C) Validate the alignment between freight order structure, charge calculation, settlement relevance, and delivery-item cost distribution.
D) Create separate settlement documents by plant even when freight orders group deliveries operationally across plants.
5. A regional laboratory supplies company uses SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management to plan shipments to clinics and central storerooms. Automatic planning reduces freight order count, but clinic shipments with appointment-based receiving windows are consolidated with routine storeroom replenishment. The freight orders are executable and use the intended carrier, but some clinic deliveries miss their receiving appointments.
Clinic operations wants appointment windows protected, while logistics wants to retain consolidation savings for routine replenishment. The constraint is to keep automatic planning and carrier subcontracting active while ensuring appointment-based delivery requirements influence freight order formation before execution.
Which planning decision best fits the constraint?
Response:
A) Keep the current planning setup and ask clinic operations to renegotiate missed receiving appointments after planning.
B) Exclude all clinic shipments from automatic planning so planners can manage appointments manually.
C) Increase consolidation weighting so the optimizer continues reducing total freight order count across clinics and storerooms.
D) Adjust planning criteria so appointment-based receiving windows restrict consolidation before freight orders are finalized.
Solutions:
| Question # 1 Answer: C | Question # 2 Answer: C | Question # 3 Answer: B | Question # 4 Answer: C | Question # 5 Answer: D |
We're so confident of our products that we provide no hassle product exchange.


By Fanny

