SAP C_S4EWM_2601 Exam Overview:
| Certification Vendor: | SAP |
| Exam Name: | SAP Certified - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Extended Warehouse Management |
| Exam Number: | C_S4EWM_2601 |
| Passing Score: | 65% |
| Related Certifications: | SAP Certified - SAP S/4HANA Extended Warehouse Management |
| Exam Price: | USD 578 |
| Real Exam Qty: | System-based tasks (no fixed number) |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Exam Format: | System-Based Assessment, Performance-based tasks |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 12 months |
| Exam Duration: | 180 minutes |
| Recommended Training: | Implementing Extended Warehouse Management in SAP S/4HANA Cloud |
| Exam Registration: | SAP Learning Hub / Certification Shop |
| Sample Questions: | SAP C_S4EWM_2601 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or onsite at SAP Authorized Testing Centers |
| Pre Condition: | Basic knowledge of SAP S/4HANA and logistics processes; recommended hands-on experience with EWM |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://learning.sap.com/my-learning/certifications/c_s4ewm_2601 |
SAP C_S4EWM_2601 Exam Syllabus Topics:
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Outbound Logistics | 25% | - Stock removal strategies - Outbound delivery processing - Wave management and optimization - Picking, packing, and staging |
| Integration and Configuration | 10% | - Warehouse monitoring and analytics - Integration with SAP S/4HANA - Basic customizing and system settings |
| Inbound Logistics | 25% | - Expected goods receipt and inbound delivery - Goods receipt and putaway strategies - Quality inspection integration - Handling unit management |
| Warehouse Structure and Master Data | 20% | - Product and packaging specifications - Organizational structure in EWM - Warehouse process types and indicators - Storage types, sections, and bins |
| Internal Warehouse Operations | 20% | - Warehouse tasks and order creation - Replenishment and cross-docking - Physical inventory processes - Radio Frequency (RF) framework |
SAP Certified - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Extended Warehouse Management Sample Questions:
1. <strong>CHALLENGE 4 — Controlled Resource Evidence for High-Value Spare Movement</strong> High-value spare movements are completed during cutover testing, but several were performed while users had broad resource coverage beyond their normal handling responsibility.
What should be validated before accepting the result?
Response:
A) Whether the same controlled movements can be completed and evidenced by the intended resource group.
B) Whether broad resource coverage should become the default for all mobile users during rollout.
C) Whether task completion alone is enough because the parts reached the expected storage or staging area.
D) Whether high-value spare movements can be excluded from mobile execution and handled manually after activation.
2. <strong>CHALLENGE 3 — Cold-Area Resource Evidence for Quality Movements</strong> The local SIT team wants broad resource coverage kept to avoid testing delays during peak inbound periods. Governance wants evidence that quality-zone tasks are executed by the assigned resource group.
Which prioritization is most appropriate?
Response:
A) Remove quality-zone tasks from SIT because they require tighter cold-area responsibility.
B) Require resource-aligned execution evidence because broad coverage may hide whether intended roles can execute the process.
C) Keep broad coverage because SIT speed should override resource traceability before rollout.
D) Treat task confirmations as sufficient because completed movements prove warehouse execution.
3. A medical nutrition warehouse introduced a new exception-based putaway behavior in SAP S/4HANA Extended Warehouse Management in a web-based private-edition quality environment. The configuration import completed during the last maintenance cycle, and normal inbound and outbound tests still run successfully. During validation, the warehouse team can reach the relevant putaway step, but the new exception behavior is visible only for one warehouse process variant and not for the other variant that was supposed to receive the same change.
The project lead wants to avoid another broad import because the maintenance cycle has already closed and the issue is isolated. The consultant must identify the most likely selective dependency before proposing a wider corrective action.
Which action should the consultant perform first?
Response:
A) erify whether the new exception behavior is assigned to the specific warehouse process variant where it is still missing.
B) reate a separate test-only warehouse process so the missing behavior can be validated outside the current execution flow.
C) eimport the full configuration package so both warehouse process variants are refreshed together after the maintenance cycle.
D) everse the recent import and restore the earlier stable setup before continuing the quality validation.
4. <strong>CHALLENGE 1 — Dealer Return Inspection Routing During Hypercare Processing</strong> The warehouse lead proposes allowing experienced users to continue selecting the correct return movement path during hypercare while the team monitors outcomes. The support lead wants automatic routing proven first.
Which response best avoids accepting a partial fix?
Response:
A) Allow experienced users to continue because completed movements show that the return flow is operationally stable.
B) Remove mixed dealer returns from hypercare scope until later distribution centers are activated.
C) Prove automatic routing first because user-selected paths may hide whether return handling and storage control are aligned.
D) Convert all inspection-relevant stock directly to regular storage and let warranty review happen outside the warehouse process.
5. <strong>CHALLENGE 2 — Site Request Release for Project Fulfillment</strong> Urgent project-site requests and scheduled replenishment are released close together during UAT. Picking tasks appear quickly, but the shared mobile queue becomes crowded before urgent dispatch readiness is protected.
Which action best balances performance and governed execution?
Response:
A) Assign all released tasks to staging support resources so pickers can focus only on urgent site requests.
B) Release all project demand earlier because task visibility is the clearest sign that backlog is shrinking.
C) Move all scheduled replenishment back to the on-premise warehouse until every regional warehouse is live.
D) Validate urgent release sequencing against mobile queue capacity and staging readiness before broadening release behavior.
Solutions:
| Question # 1 Answer: A | Question # 2 Answer: B | Question # 3 Answer: A | Question # 4 Answer: C | Question # 5 Answer: D |
We're so confident of our products that we provide no hassle product exchange.


By Athena

