ACAMS CAMS-FCI Certification All-in-One Exam Guide Dec-2023
Get Real CAMS-FCI Exam Dumps [Dec-2023] Practice Tests
NEW QUESTION # 26
A SAR/STR regarding money-mule activity prompts law enforcement action. Under U.S. law, the alleged money mules can be prosecuted:
- A. even if they were unaware that money was transferred.
- B. in a country only if funds were transferred between accounts maintained in the same country.
- C. only if they were aware of their role and actively participated.
- D. unless they can prove they were not aware of the origin of the funds.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
According to U.S. law, money mules can be prosecuted even if they were unaware that money was transferred, as long as they acted with reckless disregard of the source of the funds or the purpose of the transaction1.
This is because money mules are considered to be aiding and abetting money laundering, which does not require proof of specific intent2.
References: 1: Money Mule Awareness Booklet, page 8 2: Money Laundering: An Overview of 18 U.S.C. ยง 1956 and Related Federal Criminal Law, page 7
NEW QUESTION # 27
What action does the USA PATRIOT Act allow the US government to take regarding financial institutions (FIs) that are based outside of the US?
- A. Subpoena documents from FIs that have no presence in the US.
- B. Revoke the banking licenses of non-US FIs in countries outside the US.
- C. Sanction a country when an individual Fl does not comply with US law.
- D. Allow all US regulators to place a non-US Fl on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
According to the CAMS manual 6th edition, the USA PATRIOT Act allows the US government to subpoena documents from foreign financial institutions (FIs) that have no presence in the US (option B). The manual states that "The USA PATRIOT Act provides US law enforcement agencies with the power to subpoena documents from foreign banks that maintain correspondent accounts with US banks or have no presence in the United States" (p. 77).
NEW QUESTION # 28
While each is potentially important, which allows an investigations analyst to better write a SAR/STR narrative that is useful to law enforcement? (Select Two.)
- A. Including an explanation of the internal process that brought the transaction to the attention of the analyst
- B. Including contact information for individuals at other institutions with whom correspondence has occurred
- C. Ensuring all information in the SAR/STR is complete and accurate based on what the institution knows
- D. Including a detailed description of the known or suspected criminal violation or suspicious activity
- E. Including information about the general activity trends in the area where the suspicious transactions were conducted
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
Explanation
A SAR/STR narrative that is useful to law enforcement should include a detailed description of the known or suspected criminal violation or suspicious activity, as well as ensure that all information in the SAR/STR is complete and accurate based on what the institution knows. These elements help law enforcement to understand the nature and scope of the suspicious activity, and to follow up with further investigation if needed. The other options are not essential for a useful SAR/STR narrative, as they either provide irrelevant or redundant information, or could compromise the confidentiality of the report.
NEW QUESTION # 29 
During a review of the accounts related to Richard Aston, an investigator notices a high number of incoming payments from various individuals. They also notice that these incoming payments typically occur during large sporting events or conferences. As a result of the account review, of which illegal activity does the investigator have reasonable grounds to suspect Richard Aston?
- A. Sports betting
- B. Aftermarket sales of entertainment admission tickets
- C. Human trafficking
- D. Embezzling from the hotel
Answer: B
Explanation:
Explanation
The illegal activity that the investigator has reasonable grounds to suspect Richard Aston of is aftermarket sales of entertainment admission tickets. This is because aftermarket sales of entertainment admission tickets involve reselling tickets for events, concerts, festivals, etc. at a higher price than their face value, often through online platforms or scalpers. This practice can be illegal or unethical, depending on the jurisdiction and the terms and conditions of the original ticket seller. The investigator should look for indicators of aftermarket sales of entertainment admission tickets, such as high volume or frequency of incoming payments from various individuals, correlation between incoming payments and major events or conferences, and discrepancy between the customer's profile and the nature of the transactions. The other options are incorrect because:
A: Embezzling from the hotel is not likely, as it would involve stealing money or property from the hotel by an employee or a person in a position of trust. There is no evidence that Richard Aston works for or has access to the hotel's assets.
C: Human trafficking is not probable, as it would involve exploiting people for forced labor or commercial sexual exploitation. There is no indication that Richard Aston is involved in any form of human trafficking or has any connection to victims or perpetrators.
D: Sports betting is not plausible, as it would involve wagering money on the outcome of sporting events or games. There is no sign that Richard Aston is engaged in any sports betting activity or has any association with bookmakers or gamblers.
References:
Advanced CAMS-FCI Certification | ACAMS, Section 2: Investigating Financial Crimes, page 10 TicketSwap: The safest way to buy and sell tickets Ticketing 101 | Ticketmaster
10 Types of Tickets For Events (+ Why & When To Use Them) - Eventbrite
NEW QUESTION # 30
As part of an internal fraud investigation, an AML officer has decided to interview an employee. Which statement is most consistent with best practices?
- A. The employee should be supplied with all information about any ongoing fraud investigations.
- B. Prior to the interview, the investigator should inform the employee about the allegations.
- C. Information on the employee can be gathered from coworkers and supervisors before the employee is interviewed.
- D. The employee should be notified that failing to cooperate can lead to loss of employment.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Explanation
As part of an internal fraud investigation, an AML officer should gather information on the employee from coworkers and supervisors before the interview, as this can help to establish a baseline of the employee's behavior, role, and responsibilities, and identify any red flags or anomalies. The other options are not consistent with best practices because they can compromise the integrity of the investigation, violate the employee's rights, or discourage cooperation.
References: Advanced CAMS-FCI Certification Handbook, page 28.
NEW QUESTION # 31
In the past 6 months, a small financial institution (Fl) has received regular remittances that are increasing in value from a country with high piracy activity. The Fl's AML officer (AMLO) has also noted that piracy in this country has increased in the same time frame. Which recommendation should the AMLO make?
- A. Conduct an in-depth investigation into accumulated remittance information in the past year to find the trend of such transactions.
- B. File a SAR/STR to the appropriate AML authority immediately.
- C. Upgrade the transaction monitoring system of the Fl to include more fields so that more in-depth information is collected about the inward remittances.
- D. Request the operations department to return inbound remittances when the sender of funds is from this country.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
Verified answer: D The recommendation that the AMLO should make is to conduct an in-depth investigation into accumulated remittance information in the past year to find the trend of such transactions. This is because the regular and increasing remittances from a country with high piracy activity may indicate a possible link to illicit funds derived from piracy or other criminal activities. According to the World Bank, remittances are often used as a channel for money laundering and terrorist financing, especially when they originate from or are destined to high-risk jurisdictions1. Therefore, the AMLO should analyze the remittance data to identify the sources, destinations, amounts, frequencies, and purposes of the transactions, and compare them with the customer profiles, expected activities, and risk ratings. The AMLO should also review any relevant information from external sources, such as media reports, sanctions lists, or law enforcement alerts, to determine if there are any red flags or indicators of suspicious activity. If the investigation reveals any evidence or suspicion of money laundering or terrorist financing, the AMLO should file a SAR/STR to the appropriate AML authority.
References:
Remittances data - Migration data portal
NEW QUESTION # 32
A compliance analyst is reviewing the account activity of a customer that they suspect may be indicative of money laundering activity. Which is difficult to determine solely from the customer's account activity and KYC file?
- A. If the account has multiple transfers to the same, related businesses
- B. If the activity is materially different from related businesses
- C. If there is negative media associated with counterparties
- D. If the account is mostly dormant or has little activity
Answer: C
Explanation:
Explanation
According to the Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (CAMS) study guide, 6th edition, page 105, the correct answer is C. It can be difficult to determine if there is negative media associated with counterparties solely from the customer's account activity and KYC file.
The study guide explains that negative media can include news articles, government sanctions lists, and other sources of public information that may indicate that a counterparty is involved in illicit activities. However, this information may not be readily available in a customer's account activity or KYC file, and may require additional research or investigation.
NEW QUESTION # 33
An investigator is reviewing a case generated from the transaction monitoring system, with two large amounts of incoming remittance (IR) to an individual customer. Based on the KYC profile, the customer is a plant manager of a famous multi-national electronics manufacturing firm. As the customer has no similarly large transaction patterns for the past 2 years, the investigator sends an inquiry to the relationship manager (RM) about the nature of the transaction. The RM replies that the transaction is a consultancy fee provided from two different electronics companies with a debit note provided However, there is no detail of service provided on the debit note, and the remitters are two individuals.
Which actions should the investigator recommend to mitigate risk? (Select Two.)
- A. Document and maintain a file with the investigative findings.
- B. Re-evaluate the customer risk profile.
- C. Conduct enhanced due diligence.
- D. Exit the relationship with the customer.
- E. Discuss the investigation findings with the customer.
Answer: B,C
Explanation:
Explanation
The actions that the investigator should recommend to mitigate risk are conducting enhanced due diligence (D) and re-evaluating the customer risk profile (E). These actions are appropriate and prudent, as they allow the investigator to obtain more information and evidence about the nature and purpose of the transactions, the source and destination of the funds, and the identity and legitimacy of the parties involved. According to the ACAMS Advanced Financial Crimes Investigations Certification Study Guide1, "the FI should conduct enhanced due diligence on all parties involved in the investigation, including checking various sources of information, such as watch lists, sanctions lists, negative news, and official registries" (p. 24). The FI should also "re-assess the customer risk profile based on any new information obtained during the investigation, and adjust the customer due diligence and monitoring requirements accordingly" (p. 25).
The other options are not as appropriate or effective as options D and E. The investigator should not recommend exiting the relationship with the customer (A), as this could be premature or disproportionate, as well as potentially discriminatory or illegal. The investigator should not recommend documenting and maintaining a file with the investigative findings (B), as this is not an action to mitigate risk, but rather a standard procedure for any investigation. The investigator should not recommend discussing the investigation findings with the customer , as this could compromise the integrity and objectivity of the investigation, as well as expose the FI to legal or regulatory risks.
References: 1: ACAMS Advanced Financial Crimes Investigations Certification Study Guide
NEW QUESTION # 34
During a review, an analyst notices discrepancies between a customer's nature of business listed on the business registry and what was stated on the customers application. The analyst should:
- A. clarify discrepancies noted in the customer's declared profile given the downstream impact on the risk assessment.
- B. accept discrepancies in the information given the onboarding team did not flag any issue.
- C. close the review as there is no adverse news in the public domain.
- D. review all documents for whether certified true copies are submitted.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
The analyst should clarify discrepancies noted in the customer's declared profile given the downstream impact on the risk assessment. This is because discrepancies between the customer's nature of business and the information on the business registry may indicate that the customer is not operating a legitimate business or is trying to conceal its true activities. The analyst should verify the customer's identity, source of funds, and purpose of transactions to ensure that the customer's risk profile is accurate and consistent with the Fl's risk appetite.
References: Leading Complex Investigations Certificate, Module 2, page 9.
NEW QUESTION # 35
A compliance officer of a financial institution is reviewing a payment for sanctions compliance between two parties in Europe and Asia. The payment is in Euros and involves the provision of services to a company located in a jurisdiction subject to Office of Foreign Assets Control secondary sanctions. Which factor is most important in determining the compliance officer's response?
- A. The threat of US sanctions against foreign individuals and entities continues to exist despite the absence of a US nexus.
- B. Secondary sanctions only target specific sectors of the economy such as the banking and finance sectors.
- C. A one-off commercial transaction conducted between parties in Europe and Asia is not subject to secondary sanctions.
- D. Asset freezes only prohibit US companies from engaging in certain activities with counterparts from a sanctioned jurisdiction.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
The threat of US sanctions against foreign individuals and entities continues to exist despite the absence of a US nexus. This is stated in the Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (the 6th edition) manual on page
591, which states: "It is important to note that the threat of US sanctions against foreign individuals and entities continues to exist even when there is no direct US nexus (i.e., no US persons or assets involved)."
NEW QUESTION # 36
During transaction monitoring. Bank A learns that one of their customers. Med Supplies 123. is attempting to make a payment via wire totaling 382,500 USD to PPE Business LLC located in Mexico to purchase a large order of personal protective equipment. specifically surgical masks and face shields. Upon further verification.
Bank A decides to escalate and refers the case to investigators.
Bank A notes that, days prior to the above transaction, the same customer went to a Bank A location to wire
1,215,280 USD to Breath Well LTD located in Singapore. Breath Well was acting as an intermediary to purchase both 3-ply surgical masks and face shields from China. Bank A decided not to complete the transaction due to concerns with the involved supplier in China. Moreover, the customer is attempting to send a third wire in the amount of 350,000 USD for the purchase of these items, this time using a different vendor in China. The investigator must determine next steps in the investigation and what actions, if any. should be taken against relevant parties.
During the investigation, Bank A receives a USA PATRIOT Act Section 314(a) request related to Med Supplies 123. Which steps should the investigator take when fulfilling the request? (Select Three.)
- A. Do not respond to Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) if the requested information is not present in the financial institution's system of records.
- B. Review the account(s) activity and proactively file a SAR/STR using the 314(a) request as the basis for the filing.
- C. Report back to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) within 15 days of receipt of the request via a secure internet website.
- D. Report to Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) that a match was found without revealing any other details.
- E. Exit the relationship with the business since it appears that customer is under investigation.
- F. Search its records expeditiously to determine whether it maintains(ed) any accounts for the subject(s) listed in the request.
Answer: C,D,F
Explanation:
Explanation
According to the FinCEN's 314(a) Fact Sheet1, the steps that the investigator should take when fulfilling the request are:
Search its records expeditiously to determine whether it maintains(ed) any accounts for the subject(s) listed in the request. This is option F.
Report back to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) within 15 days of receipt of the request via a secure internet website. This is option E.
Report to Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) that a match was found without revealing any other details. This is option D.
The other options are incorrect because:
Exiting the relationship with the business since it appears that customer is under investigation is not required by the 314(a) program and may interfere with law enforcement's investigation. This is option A:Not responding to Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) if the requested information is not present in the financial institution's system of records is contrary to the 314(a) program, which requires financial institutions to respond whether or not they have a match. This is option B.
Reviewing the account(s) activity and proactively filing a SAR/STR using the 314(a) request as the basis for the filing is not appropriate, as the 314(a) request itself is not a sufficient reason to file a SAR/STR. The financial institution should only file a SAR/STR if it has its own independent suspicion of money laundering or terrorist financing. This is option C.
References: 1: FinCEN's 314(a) Fact Sheet
NEW QUESTION # 37
A KYC specialist from the first line of defense at a bank initiates an internal escalation based on a letter of credit received by the bank.
MEMO
To: Jane Doe. Compliance Manager, Bank B From: Jack Brown, KYC Specialist, Bank B RE: Concerning letter of credit A letter of credit (LC) was received from a correspondent bank.
Bank A. in Country A. in Asia with strict capital controls, providing guarantee of payment to Bank B's client for the export of 10 luxury cars located in Country B. located in Europe. Bank A's customer is a general in the army where Bank A is headquartered.
The information contained in the LC is as follows:
* Advising amount per unit 30.000.00 EU *10 units of BMW
* Model IX3
* Year of registration: 2020
Upon checks on Bank B's client, the exporter mentioned that the transactions were particularly important, and a fast process would be much appreciated in order to avoid reputational damage to the firm and the banks involved in the trade finance process. The exporter has a longstanding relationship with Bank B and was clearly a good income generator. The exporter indicated that, as a general, the importer was trustworthy.
The relationship manager <RM) was contacted to conduct a full review of the exporter and to conduct a site visit.
Feedback from the RM:
The RM contacted the exporter for a client courtesy visit, but it was rearranged four times as the exporter kept cancelling the appointments. When the exporter was finally pinned down for an interview, employees were reluctant to provide clear answers about the basis of the transaction. The employees were evasive when asked about the wider business and trade activity in the country.
Findings from the investigation from various internal and external sources of information:
* There were no negative news or sanctions hits on the exporter company, directors, and shareholders.
* The registered address of the exporting business was a residential address.
* The price of the cats was checked and confirmed to be significantly below the market price of approximately 70,000 EU, based on manufacturer's new price guide.
* The key controllers behind the exporting company, that is the directors and During the investigation, the investigator determines that a nephew of the general (Bank A's customer) is a customer at Bank B.
Which step should the investigator take next?
- A. Determine whether there is a business relationship between the nephew and the general.
- B. Seek senior management approval to continue the relationship with the nephew.
- C. File a SAR/STR in relation to corruption involving the nephew and the general.
- D. Flag the nephew as a PEP by association.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
The step that the investigator should take next is to flag the nephew as a PEP by association (D). This is because the nephew is related to a general who is a senior military official and a customer of Bank A, which is a high-risk jurisdiction with strict capital controls. According to the ACAMS Advanced Financial Crimes Investigations Certification Study Guide1, "the FI should identify and flag any customers who are PEPs or have close associations with PEPs, such as family members or business partners" (p. 24). The FI should also conduct enhanced due diligence on these customers and monitor their transactions for any suspicious or unusual activity.
The other options are not correct. The investigator should not file a SAR/STR in relation to corruption involving the nephew and the general (A), as this could be premature or unnecessary, as there is no evidence of corruption or criminal activity between them. The investigator should not determine whether there is a business relationship between the nephew and the general (B), as this is not relevant or material to the investigation, as the nephew and the general are customers of different banks and are not involved in the same transaction. The investigator should not seek senior management approval to continue the relationship with the nephew , as this could be premature or disproportionate, as there is no indication that the nephew poses a high risk or requires termination.
References: 1: ACAMS Advanced Financial Crimes Investigations Certification Study Guide, available at ACAMS
NEW QUESTION # 38
An investigator at a corporate bank is conducting transaction monitoring alerts clearance.
KYC profile background: An entity customer, doing business offshore in Hong Kong, established a banking business relationship with the bank since 2017 for deposit and loan purposes. It acts as an offshore investment holding company. The customer declared that the ongoing source of funds to this account comes from group-related companies.
* X is the UBO. and owns 97% shares of this entity customer;
* Y is is the authorized signatory of this entity customer. This entity customer was previously the subject of a SAR/STR.
KYC PROFILE
Customer Name: AAA International Company. Ltd
Customer ID: 123456
Account Opened: June 2017
Last KYC review date: 15 Nov 2020
Country and Year of Incorporation: The British Virgin Islands, May 2017 AML risk level: High Account opening and purpose: Deposits, Loans, and Trade Finance Anticipated account activities: 1 to 5 transactions per year and around 1 million per transaction amount During the investigation, the investigator reviewed remittance transactions activities for the period from Jul
2019 to Sep 2021 and noted the following transactions pattern:
TRANSACTION JOURNAL
Review dates: from July 2019 to Sept 2021
For Hong Kong Dollars (HKD) currency:
Incoming transactions: 2 inward remittances of around 1.88 million HKD in total from different third parties Outgoing transactions: 24 outward remittances of around 9 4 million HKD in total to different third parties For United States Dollars (USD) currency:
Incoming transactions: 13 inward remittances of around 3.3 million USD in total from different third parties Outgoing transactions: 10 outward remittances of around 9.4 million USD in total to different third parties.
RFI Information and Supporting documents:
According to the RFI reply received on 26 May 2021, the customer provided the bank with the information below:
1J All incoming funds received in HKD & USD currencies were monies lent from non-customers of the bank.
Copies of loan agreements had been provided as supporting documents. All of the loan agreements were in the same format and all the lenders are engaged in trading business.
2) Some loan agreements were signed among four parties, including among lenders. borrower (the bank's customer), guarantor, and guardian with supplemental agreements, which stated that the customer, as a borrower, who failed to repay a loan Which suspicious activity should the investigator identify during the review of the loan agreements?
- A. Online information found that X is the chairman of a business group of companies.
- B. Y signed on behalf of the lenders.
- C. AAA International Company Ltd.'s account has transactions in HKD and USD.
- D. Y is the authorized signatory on the beneficial ownership form.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Explanation
The correct answer is D because it is a suspicious activity that Y, who is the authorized signatory of the customer, also signed on behalf of the lenders. This indicates a possible conflict of interest, collusion, or fraud.
The other options are not suspicious activities based on the information given.
References: [Advanced CAMS-FCI Study Guide], page 17-18
NEW QUESTION # 39
Online payments from a customer's account to three foreign entities trigger an investigation. The investigator knows the funds originated from family real estate after an investment company approached the customer online. Funds were remitted for pre-lPO shares. Which should now occur in the investigation?
- A. Have the relationship manager contact the customer to understand the nature of the transaction.
- B. Seek evidence for the customer's source of wealth.
- C. Inspect electronic banking login records.
- D. Review the structure of the transactions to the three entities.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
The correct answer is C because reviewing the structure of the transactions to the three entities can help the investigator to identify any red flags or indicators of fraud, such as unusual amounts, frequency, destinations, or beneficiaries. The other options are not as relevant or effective in this scenario. Option A is not necessary because the investigator already knows the source of funds for the customer. Option B is not advisable because contacting the customer directly may alert them to the investigation and compromise its integrity. Option D is not helpful because inspecting electronic banking login records does not provide any information about the nature or purpose of the transactions.
References:
Advanced CAMS-FCI Study Guide, page 281
Financial Crime Typologies - Intermediate Certificate Course, Module 32
NEW QUESTION # 40
Which statement most accurately characterizes the methods used by transnational criminal organizations?
- A. They see each other as competitors and rarely cooperate.
- B. They routinely engage in many different types of criminal activities as long as they think it will benefit them.
- C. They are unlikely to associate with known terrorist organizations due to the reputational risks.
- D. They are likely to specialize in one particular method and continue to refine that method to escape detection.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Explanation
The statement that most accurately characterizes the methods used by transnational criminal organizations is that they routinely engage in many different types of criminal activities as long as they think it will benefit them . This is because transnational criminal organizations are flexible and adaptable, and they exploit opportunities and vulnerabilities in different markets and jurisdictions. According to ACAMS2, "Transnational criminal organizations are involved in a wide range of illicit activities, such as drug trafficking, human trafficking, arms trafficking, money laundering, cybercrime, environmental crime, fraud, corruption, and terrorism" (p. 3). They also "operate across borders and regions, using complex networks and structures to evade detection and prosecution" (p. 3).
The other statements are not as accurate or comprehensive as option C. Transnational criminal organizations are unlikely to associate with known terrorist organizations due to the reputational risks (A) is false, as transnational criminal organizations may collaborate or cooperate with terrorist organizations for mutual benefit or convenience, such as sharing resources, routes, or contacts. Transnational criminal organizations are likely to specialize in one particular method and continue to refine that method to escape detection (B) is false, as transnational criminal organizations may diversify or change their methods depending on the circumstances or opportunities, such as shifting products, markets, or modus operandi. Transnational criminal organizations see each other as competitors and rarely cooperate (D) is false, as transnational criminal organizations may form alliances or partnerships with other criminal groups for strategic or tactical reasons, such as sharing information, expertise, or influence.
NEW QUESTION # 41
CLIENT INFORMATION FORM Client Name: ABC Tech Corp Client ID. Number: 08125 Name: ABC Tech Corp Registered Address: Mumbai, India Work Address: Mumbai, India Cell Phone: "**"'" Alt Phone:
"*""* Email: ........"
Client Profile Information:
Sector: Financial
Engaged in business from (date): 02 Jan 2020 Sub-sector: Software-Cryptocurrency Exchange Expected Annual Transaction Amount: 125,000 USD Payment Nature: Transfer received from clients' fund Received from: Clients Received for: Sale of digital assets The client identified itself as Xryptocurrency Exchange." The client has submitted the limited liability partnership deed. However, the bank's auditing team is unable to identify the client's exact business profile as the cryptocurrency exchange specified by the client as their major business awaits clearance from the country's regulator. The client has submitted documents/communications exchanged with the regulator and has cited the lack of governing laws in the country of their operation as the reason for the delay.
During the financial crime investigation, the investigator discovers that some of the customer due diligence (CDD) documents submitted by the client were fraudulent. The investigator also finds that some of the information in the financial institution's information depository is false. What should the financial crime investigator do next?
- A. Escalate to the compliance officer/money laundering reporting officer to file a SAR/STR.
- B. Request that the relationship manager conduct a CDD refresh as it is a material trigger.
- C. Report collusion between the cryptocurrency exchange and internal staff in the internal hotline or whistle-blowing channel.
- D. Contact the client directly and obtain the relevant notarized documents and information.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
The correct answer is C. Escalate to the compliance officer/money laundering reporting officer to file a SAR/STR. This is because the financial crime investigator has found evidence of fraudulent documents and false information, which indicate a high risk of money laundering or other financial crimes. The investigator should not contact the client directly, as this may tip them off or compromise the investigation. The investigator should also not report collusion between the cryptocurrency exchange and internal staff, as this is an assumption that has not been verified. The investigator should not request a CDD refresh, as this is not sufficient to address the serious issues identified.
References:
Advanced CAMS-FCI Study Guide, page 291
Advanced CAMS-FCI Study Guide, page 311
Advanced CAMS-FCI Study Guide, page 331
1: https://www.acams.org/en/certifications/advanced-cams/advanced-financial-crimes-investigations
NEW QUESTION # 42
Which main vulnerability has led to an increase in the ransomware attacks perpetuated on small businesses?
- A. Weaker cybersecurity controls
- B. Inability to recover the encrypted information
- C. Tendency not to contact law enforcement
- D. Ability to pay larger ransoms
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
Weaker cybersecurity controls are a main vulnerability that has led to an increase in ransomware attacks on small businesses, as they make them easier targets for cybercriminals who can exploit their systems and demand payment for restoring access to their data. The other options are not relevant to the vulnerability, as they relate to the consequences or responses of the victims.
NEW QUESTION # 43
An EU bank account received 1.8 million EUR from a Swiss bank. The EU bank determines the originator was indicted by U.S. law enforcement, arrested in Switzerland, and extradited for alleged insider trading.
Which is the best reason the EU bank should file a SAR/STR?
- A. Insider trading is a predicate offense in the U.S. and Switzerland.
- B. The events raise concerns that the payment represents proceeds from insider trading.
- C. The originator was indicted by U.S. law enforcement.
- D. The Swiss bank filed a SAR/STR with the Money Laundering Reporting Office Switzerland.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Explanation
The best reason the EU bank should file a SAR/STR is that the events raise concerns that the payment represents proceeds from insider trading, which is a form of market abuse and a predicate offense for money laundering in many jurisdictions. The fact that the originator was indicted by U.S. law enforcement, arrested in Switzerland, and extradited for alleged insider trading indicates that there is a strong suspicion that the funds are derived from criminal activity. The other options are not sufficient reasons to file a SAR/STR, as they do not directly relate to the nature or source of the funds.
References: [Financial Action Task Force Report on Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks and Vulnerabilities Associated with Gold], page 17 : [Leading Complex Investigations Certificate], page 12
NEW QUESTION # 44
The intended benefits of section 314(b) of the USA PATRIOT Act include: (Select Three.)
- A. expediting the filing of SARs/STRs due to the information sharing facilitated by 314(b).
- B. providing mandatory results to law enforcement agencies so that they can more easily obtain useful information.
- C. sharing the existence and content of SARs/STRs with other participating FIs.
- D. participating FIs sharing information about suspicious activity by customers that may have otherwise gone unnoticed.
- E. detecting money laundering and TF approaches and schemes across multiple financial institutions (FIs).
- F. obtaining additional information on customers or transactions regarding potential money laundering or terrorist financing (TF).
Answer: D,E,F
Explanation:
Explanation
Section 314(b) of the USA PATRIOT Act allows financial institutions to share information with each other, under a safe harbor that offers protection from liability, in order to better identify and report potential money laundering or terrorist financing activities. The intended benefits of this information sharing include:
Participating financial institutions sharing information about suspicious activity by customers that may have otherwise gone unnoticed. For example, if a customer is conducting transactions with multiple financial institutions that individually do not appear suspicious, but collectively indicate a pattern of money laundering or terrorist financing, the financial institutions can share this information and report it to the authorities.
Detecting money laundering and terrorist financing approaches and schemes across multiple financial institutions. For example, if a financial institution identifies a new typology or modus operandi of money laundering or terrorist financing, it can share this information with other financial institutions to help them prevent or detect similar activities by their customers.
Obtaining additional information on customers or transactions regarding potential money laundering or terrorist financing. For example, if a financial institution has incomplete or insufficient information on a customer or a transaction that raises suspicion, it can request more information from another financial institution that may have dealt with the same customer or transaction.
References:
Section 314(b) | FinCEN.gov
Section 314(b) Fact Sheet - FinCEN.gov
NEW QUESTION # 45
Each month the automated transaction monitoring system generates alerts based on predetermined scenarios.
An alert was generated in relation to the account activity of ABC Foundation. Below is the transaction history for ABC Foundation (dates are in DD/MM/YYYY format).
The relationship manager for ABC Foundation contacts the client to request more information on the beneficiary of the transfer in Turkey. ABC Foundation advises that this is a not-for-profit charity group called
'Forever Free." Which is the best next step in the investigation?
- A. File a SAR/STR with the new information learned about the beneficiary.
- B. Contact the financial institution in Turkey that has a relationship with Forever Free and advise them of the investigation.
- C. Update the customer profile to include Forever Free as the recipient of the funds.
- D. Check the junsdiction's list of known chanties with connections to terrorist activity.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
The best next step in the investigation is to check the jurisdiction's list of known charities with connections to terrorist activity . This is because the FI has a responsibility to verify the legitimacy and reputation of the beneficiary of the funds, especially if it is a charity or non-profit organization that operates in a high-risk jurisdiction or sector. According to the ACAMS Advanced Financial Crimes Investigations Certification Study Guide1, "the FI should conduct enhanced due diligence on all parties involved in the investigation, including checking various sources of information, such as watch lists, sanctions lists, negative news, and official registries" (p. 24). The FI should also check if the beneficiary is consistent with the customer's profile and expected activity.
The other options are not as appropriate or effective as option C.
Contacting the financial institution in Turkey that has a relationship with Forever Free and advising them of the investigation (A) could violate confidentiality or data protection laws, as well as compromise the investigation or alert the customer or beneficiary of the suspicion. Updating the customer profile to include Forever Free as the recipient of the funds (B) could be premature or inaccurate, as it does not verify the nature and purpose of the transfer or the identity and legitimacy of the beneficiary. Filing a SAR/STR with the new information learned about the beneficiary (D) could also be premature or incomplete, as it does not confirm if there is any suspicious or criminal activity involved in the transfer or if there are any other red flags or indicators.
NEW QUESTION # 46
During transaction monitoring. Bank A learns that one of its customers. Med Supplies 123, is attempting to make a payment via wire totaling 382.500 USD to PPE Business LLC located in Mexico to purchase a large order of personal protective equipment. specifically surgical masks and face shields. Upon further verification.
Bank A decides to escalate and refers the case to investigators.
Bank A notes that days prior to the above transaction, the same customer went to a Bank A location to wire
1,215,280 USD to Breath Well LTD located in Singapore. Breath Well was acting as an intermediary to purchase both 3-ply surgical masks and face shields from China. Bank A decided not to complete the transaction due to concerns with the involved supplier in China. Moreover, the customer is attempting to send a third wire in the amount of 350,000 USD for the purchase of these items, this time using a different vendor in China. The investigator must determine the next steps in the investigation and what actions, if any. should be taken against relevant parties.
The investigator is gathering more information to determine if a SAR/STR filing is needed. Which steps are the correct ways of collecting the additional information? (Select Two.)
- A. Reach out to the relationship manager asking if more up-to-date customer due diligence information can be collected on the customer.
- B. Conduct open-source research to determine if the customer and involved counterparties are in the same business field.
- C. Reach out to the customer and ask for supporting documentation for the conducted wires to avoid SAR/STR filing.
- D. Issue a USA PATRIOT ACT Section 314(b) request to participating financial institutions advising that information is needed to decide if the activity is suspicious.
- E. Use available documentation received from law enforcement (e.g.. grand jury subpoena) as red flags in SAR/STR filing.
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
Explanation
The correct answer is A and C because these indicators suggest that the customer is using fraudulent documents and misrepresenting the goods to conceal the illicit nature of the transactions. Fentanyl traffickers often use front companies and falsified invoices to disguise their shipments as legitimate products, such as medical supplies or chemicals. Reviewing the invoices and transportation documents, as well as the FDA product certifications, can help to identify discrepancies or anomalies that indicate fraud or deception.
References: Fentanyl and Fentanyl Analogues: Federal Trends and Trafficking Patterns, page 18; Fentanyl Trafficking Offenses, page 2.
NEW QUESTION # 47
An investigator receives an alert documenting a series of transactions. A limited liability corporation (LLC) wired 59.000,000 USD to an overseas account associated with a state-run oil company. A second account associated with the state-run oil company wired 600,000,000 USD to the LLC. The LLC then wired money to other accounts, a money brokerage firm, and real estate purchases.
The investigator initiated an enhanced KYC investigation on the LLC. The financial institution opened the LLC account a couple of weeks prior to the series of transactions. The names associated with the LLC had changed multiple times since the account opened. A search of those names revealed relations with multiple LLCs. Public records about the LLCs did not show any identifiable business activities.
Open-source research identified mixed reports about the brokerage firm.
The firm indicated it purchased mutual funds for its clients and dispensed returns to clients.
Media reports claimed the firm laundered money by holding money for a fee before returning it to investors.
Which information should the investigator review first when examining the wire transaction documentation?
- A. The sanctions screening tool to see if the transaction was stopped
- B. Whether the wire transfers were initiated domestically
- C. The Travel Rule requirements for recordkeeping
- D. How the wire transfers were initiated (e.g., phone, online, branch visit)
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
The investigator should review how the wire transfers were initiated first, because this could indicate the level of involvement and knowledge of the LLC account holders. If the wire transfers were initiated online or by phone, it could suggest that the account holders were trying to avoid face-to-face contact with the bank staff and reduce the chances of being questioned or identified. If the wire transfers were initiated in person at a branch, it could indicate that the account holders were confident or careless about their activities, or that they had some relationship with the bank staff. The method of initiation could also affect the quality and quantity of information collected by the bank about the wire transfers, such as the purpose, source, and destination of the funds. References: ACAMS Advanced Financial Crimes Investigations Certification Study Guide, page 65.
NEW QUESTION # 48
......
Last CAMS-FCI practice test reviews: Practice Test ACAMS dumps: https://www.surepassexams.com/CAMS-FCI-exam-bootcamp.html
Try CAMS-FCI Free Now! Real Exam Question Answers: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Vz08f-uJbf2_jQCq2LX8ye8Jy099k4dQ